
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has been at the center of Turkish politics for decades, a figure who evokes strong emotions both at home and abroad. From a humble beginning in Istanbul to the pinnacle of power, his journey is a compelling story of ambition, political savvy, and transformation. Understanding Erdogan is key to understanding modern Turkey, its successes, its challenges, and its direction in the 21st century. This article will explore his life, his political ideology, his major policies, and his lasting impact on the nation and the world. We will look at his rise, his economic strategies, his foreign policy shifts, and the controversies that have defined his time in office.
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan was born on February 26, 1954, in Kasımpaşa, a working-class neighborhood of Istanbul. His family was originally from Rize, a province in Turkey’s Black Sea region. He spent his early childhood in Rize before his family moved back to Istanbul when he was 13. To help support his family, the young Erdogan sold lemonade and sesame buns on the streets. This early experience in the bustling heart of Istanbul gave him a firsthand look at the struggles and aspirations of ordinary Turkish people, a connection he would later leverage effectively in his political career.
His formal education took place at an Imam Hatip school, a type of vocational public school designed to train government-employed imams. These schools provided a strong religious education alongside a modern curriculum. This background deeply influenced his conservative and religious outlook. He later studied business administration at what is now Marmara University. During his university years, he became actively involved in anti-communist student groups and Islamist political movements, most notably the National Turkish Student Union. It was during this formative period that he met Necmettin Erbakan, a prominent figure in Turkish Islamist politics who would become his mentor.
The political journey of Erdogan began in earnest within the Islamist political tradition led by Necmettin Erbakan. He joined the Welfare Party, the successor to previous Islamist parties that had been banned by Turkey’s secularist judiciary. Known for his organizational skills and powerful oratory, Erdogan quickly rose through the party’s ranks. He served as the party’s provincial chair for Istanbul in 1985, a position that gave him a significant platform in Turkey’s largest city.
His political style was already taking shape: a blend of religious conservatism, populist appeal, and a focus on social justice for the urban poor. He connected with voters who felt marginalized by the secular elite that had dominated Turkish politics for decades. This period was crucial for building his grassroots support network, which would prove indispensable in his later electoral successes. He honed his ability to speak the language of the common person, positioning himself as a champion of the disenfranchised.
In 1994, Erdogan achieved a major breakthrough by being elected mayor of Istanbul, a sprawling metropolis of over 12 million people. His victory was a shock to the secular establishment. Many were skeptical that a politician with his Islamist background could govern a diverse and modern city like Istanbul. However, his tenure as mayor is widely regarded, even by some of his critics, as a period of significant progress. He tackled some of the city’s most pressing issues with a pragmatic and results-oriented approach.
Under his leadership, the city saw improvements in its infrastructure, including new roads and bridges to ease chronic traffic congestion. He addressed long-standing problems like water shortages by laying hundreds of kilometers of new pipelines. He also initiated projects to reduce air pollution, a major health concern at the time. Furthermore, Erdogan implemented social programs and financial aid for the poor, strengthening his image as a leader who cared about the welfare of ordinary citizens. His time as mayor demonstrated his administrative capabilities and his ability to deliver tangible results, broadening his appeal beyond his conservative base.
The political career of Erdogan faced a major setback in 1997. During a speech, he recited a poem that included the lines: “The minarets are our bayonets, the domes our helmets, the mosques our barracks, and the faithful our soldiers.” Turkey’s secular judiciary, which viewed his words as an incitement to religious hatred, convicted him in 1998. He was sentenced to ten months in prison and banned from holding political office. He ultimately served four months.
This prison sentence, however, turned into a political advantage. For his supporters, it cemented his status as a martyr who was being persecuted by an unjust secular system. Upon his release, Erdogan distanced himself from his old mentor, Necmettin Erbakan, and a more rigid form of Islamist politics. Alongside other reform-minded politicians like Abdullah Gül, he co-founded the Justice and Development Party (AKP) in August 2001. The AKP presented itself as a “conservative democratic” party, drawing parallels to Christian democratic parties in Europe. This rebranding was crucial. It aimed to reassure secular voters, the business community, and the international community that the party would respect Turkey’s democratic and secular framework.
The AKP’s message of change, clean governance, and economic prosperity resonated with a Turkish public weary of corruption and economic instability. In the November 2002 general election, the AKP won a landslide victory, securing a large majority in parliament. However, due to his political ban, Erdogan was unable to become prime minister immediately. His close ally, Abdullah Gül, served as prime minister for the first few months. After a constitutional amendment lifted his ban, Erdogan won a by-election and officially became Turkey’s Prime Minister in March 2003.
This marked the beginning of a new era in Turkish politics. The rise of Erdogan and the AKP represented a significant power shift away from the traditional secular establishment, which included the military, the judiciary, and the old political parties. His government promised to create a “New Turkey” that was more democratic, prosperous, and influential on the world stage. The initial years of his rule were characterized by political reforms aimed at strengthening democracy and aligning Turkey with European Union standards, as well as a period of unprecedented economic growth.
During the first decade of his rule, Erdogan presided over a period of remarkable economic expansion. The Turkish economy, which had been prone to crises, stabilized and grew at an impressive rate. Inflation was brought under control, foreign investment poured in, and per capita income tripled. This economic success was a cornerstone of his popularity. His government’s policies, often dubbed “Erdonomics,” focused on fiscal discipline, privatization of state-owned enterprises, and encouraging a consumption-driven growth model fueled by construction and credit.
A key feature of this era was the launch of numerous “mega-projects,” particularly in Istanbul. These ambitious infrastructure projects were designed to showcase Turkey’s growing economic power and modernize the country.
Key Infrastructure Projects Under Erdoğan:
These projects created jobs and improved infrastructure, but they also drew criticism for their environmental impact, lack of transparency in tendering processes, and reliance on debt.
While the early years were a story of success, the Turkish economy has faced significant challenges in more recent times. The growth model that relied heavily on foreign credit and construction has shown its limits. The country has struggled with high inflation, a depreciating currency (the Turkish Lira), and rising unemployment. Critics argue that the shift to an executive presidency has undermined the independence of economic institutions, including the Central Bank. Unorthodox policies, such as the pressure to keep interest rates low despite soaring inflation, have worried international investors and economists. Navigating these economic headwinds has become one of the most significant challenges for the Erdogan government. For more insights on global economic trends, one might look at resources like those available at https://forbesplanet.co.uk/.
The foreign policy under Erdogan has been dynamic, ambitious, and often controversial. Initially, his government pursued a policy of “zero problems with neighbors,” aiming to build strong diplomatic and economic ties with all countries in the region. This period saw a flourishing of relations with countries in the Middle East, the Balkans, and beyond. A major goal was to advance Turkey’s long-standing bid to join the European Union, and the government implemented numerous reforms to meet the EU’s membership criteria.
However, over time, Turkish foreign policy shifted to become more assertive and independent. This was partly a response to perceived stagnation in the EU accession process and the turmoil unleashed by the Arab Spring uprisings starting in 2011. Erdogan sought to position Turkey as a major regional power and a leader of the Sunni Muslim world. This led to a more interventionist foreign policy, including military involvement in Syria and Libya, and a complex relationship with global powers like the United States and Russia.
|
Country/Region |
Relationship Dynamics and Key Issues |
|---|---|
|
United States |
A complex and often strained alliance. Key points of friction include U.S. support for Kurdish YPG fighters in Syria (which Turkey views as terrorists), and Turkey’s purchase of the Russian S-400 missile defense system, which led to U.S. sanctions. Despite these tensions, the two countries remain NATO allies. |
|
European Union |
The relationship has soured significantly. While Turkey is still an official candidate for membership, accession talks have been frozen. The EU has been critical of what it sees as democratic backsliding in Turkey, particularly regarding the rule of law and press freedom. The 2016 refugee deal, where Turkey agreed to stem the flow of migrants to Europe, remains a key point of cooperation and leverage. |
|
Russia |
A pragmatic and transactional relationship. Erdogan and Russian President Vladimir Putin have cooperated on some issues, such as energy projects (TurkStream pipeline) and managing the conflict in Syria, while being on opposing sides in others, like in Libya and Nagorno-Karabakh. The purchase of the S-400 system was a major step in deepening ties with Moscow. |
|
Middle East |
Erdogan has been a vocal supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood and backed opposition movements during the Arab Spring. This put Turkey at odds with countries like Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. However, in recent years, there have been efforts to mend these relationships as Turkey seeks to de-escalate regional tensions and attract investment. |
One of the most significant and lasting changes under Erdogan was the transformation of Turkey’s system of government. For most of its history, the Republic of Turkey had been a parliamentary democracy, where power was concentrated in the prime minister and the parliament. Erdogan had long argued that this system was inefficient and prone to producing weak coalition governments. He advocated for a switch to an executive presidential system, similar to that of the United States or France, which he claimed would bring stability and effective governance.
After a controversial coup attempt in July 2016, the push for this change gained momentum. A constitutional referendum was held in April 2017. The “Yes” campaign, led by Erdogan, argued that the new system was necessary for Turkey’s security and prosperity. The “No” campaign warned that it would lead to a concentration of power in one person’s hands and erode democratic checks and balances. The referendum passed with a narrow majority of 51.4%.
The new system, which came into full effect after the 2018 elections, abolished the office of the prime minister and transferred all executive powers to the president. Under this system, the president has the authority to:
This marked a fundamental reshaping of the Turkish state. Erdogan was elected as the first president under this new system in 2018 and was re-elected in 2023, further solidifying his grip on power. This transformation remains one of the most debated aspects of his legacy.
The rule of Erdogan has been marked by numerous controversies and has drawn significant criticism both within Turkey and from the international community. A primary concern has been the erosion of democratic norms and institutions. Critics accuse the government of using the judiciary to silence political opponents, journalists, and academics. After the 2016 coup attempt, a state of emergency was declared, leading to the arrest or dismissal of tens of thousands of public servants, military personnel, and civilians accused of links to the coup plotters.
Freedom of the press has also been a major area of concern. Turkey has been frequently cited as one of the world’s leading jailers of journalists. Many media outlets critical of the government have been shut down or taken over by pro-government businesspeople. This has led to a media landscape that is largely dominated by voices supportive of Erdogan and the AKP, making it difficult for opposition views to be heard. Issues like these are often covered in global analyses, a field where informed perspectives are crucial.
A turning point in how the Erdogan government was perceived came in May 2013 with the Gezi Park protests. The demonstrations started as a small, peaceful sit-in to protest plans to redevelop Gezi Park, one of the few remaining green spaces in central Istanbul. However, a harsh police crackdown on the protesters ignited nationwide demonstrations against what many saw as the government’s increasing authoritarianism, encroachment on secular lifestyles, and lack of consultation.
The protests brought together a diverse coalition of secularists, liberals, students, and nationalists. Erdogan framed the protests as a conspiracy orchestrated by foreign powers and domestic enemies to topple his government. His uncompromising stance and the continued use of police force further polarized Turkish society. The Gezi Park protests were a clear sign of the deep social and political divisions that had emerged under his rule.
Assessing the legacy of a political figure who is still in power is a complex task. However, it is clear that Recep Tayyip Erdoğan has fundamentally transformed Turkey. His supporters credit him with empowering a previously marginalized conservative and religious segment of the population, overseeing a period of significant economic development, and building a modern infrastructure. They see him as a strong leader who has restored Turkey’s national pride and made it a more assertive player on the global stage. For them, Erdogan is the man who built a “New Turkey.”
His critics, on the other hand, argue that his legacy will be defined by democratic backsliding, the concentration of power, and the polarization of society. They point to the erosion of the rule of law, the crackdown on dissent, and the challenges facing the economy as major stains on his record. For them, he has dismantled the secular and democratic foundations of the Turkish Republic established by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. The debate over his impact will undoubtedly continue for many years to come, as Turkey navigates the path he has set for it.
1. How long has Erdogan been in power?
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan first came to national power as Prime Minister in March 2003. He served as Prime Minister until 2014. He was then elected President in 2014 and has held that office ever since, being re-elected in 2018 and 2023.
2. What is the AKP party?
The AKP, or Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi in Turkish), is a political party in Turkey co-founded by Erdogan in 2001. It identifies as conservative democratic and has been the ruling party in Turkey since its first election victory in 2002.
3. What was the 2016 Turkish coup attempt?
On July 15, 2016, a faction within the Turkish Armed Forces attempted to overthrow the government of Erdogan. The coup attempt failed after citizens took to the streets to oppose it. The government blamed the movement of Fethullah Gülen, a U.S.-based Muslim cleric, for orchestrating the coup, leading to a widespread crackdown on his alleged followers.
4. Why did Turkey change to a presidential system?
Erdogan and his supporters argued that the parliamentary system was unstable and inefficient. They promoted the presidential system as a way to ensure strong and stable governance. A constitutional referendum in 2017 approved the change, which was fully implemented in 2018, concentrating executive power in the hands of the president.
5. What is Turkey’s relationship with the EU?
Turkey is an official candidate for European Union membership, but the accession process has stalled. The EU has expressed serious concerns about the state of democracy, human rights, and the rule of law in Turkey under Erdogan. While cooperation continues in areas like trade and migration, full membership is not seen as a realistic prospect in the near future.





